Telegram's Tiny Engineering Team: Security Risk?

The audacity of some tech companies never ceases to amaze me. In a world increasingly reliant on intricate digital platforms, where robustness and security are paramount, one would expect a company like Telegram to prioritize a hefty engineering team. Yet, a recent revelation has left me flabbergasted. Telegram, the popular messaging platform, has confessed to employing a mere thirty engineers - and astonishingly, seems to think this is perfectly acceptable.

This revelation, courtesy of Telegram’s founder Pavel Durov, was delivered during a podcast interview. Durov, in a display of perplexing logic, boasted about the “super efficiency” of his lean engineering team, claiming that this minimalist approach makes Telegram more agile and responsive. While a lean structure can have its merits, the notion that a global messaging platform, entrusted with the sensitive data of millions, can operate effectively with such a skeletal crew is simply preposterous.

Security experts, including Eva Galperin, Director of Cybersecurity at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), have rightly expressed alarm at this revelation. Telegram’s reputation for security has always been questionable. Their refusal to enable end-to-end encryption by default, their reliance on a proprietary encryption algorithm, and the location of their servers in the UAE all raise eyebrows. Add to this mix a team of only thirty engineers, and you have a recipe for disaster.

Telegram is now the main place for hackers to buy and sell new threats

Telegram is now offering business accounts to take on WhatsApp and Facebook

Galperin succinctly summarizes the inherent flaws in Durov’s logic: “Thirty engineers’ means that there is no one to fight legal requests, there is no infrastructure for dealing with abuse and content moderation issues.” Her point is undeniable. While engineers might excel at keeping the lights on, navigating the complexities of legal compliance, content moderation, and user safety requires a dedicated team with specialized expertise.

Durov’s attempt to portray this situation as a positive spin on a glaring deficiency is worrisome. It smacks of a disregard for the essential elements that underpin a safe and reliable digital platform. One can only hope that this revelation serves as a wake-up call, prompting Telegram to invest in building a comprehensive team capable of tackling the multifaceted challenges of managing a global communication platform. The security and privacy of millions hang in the balance.

Durov’s myopic focus on engineering efficiency, while neglecting critical aspects like legal compliance and user safety, is a risky gamble. Let’s hope that Telegram reconsiders its approach before a major security breach forces their hand. The stakes are simply too high to leave such a critical platform vulnerable.